Five New Developments in Hemophilia
This post first appeared on Vector, a blog of Boston Children's Hospital an was written by Ellis Neufeld, MD, PhD, a hematologist at Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center.
From new longer-acting drugs to promising gene therapy trials, much is changing in the treatment of hemophilia, the inherited bleeding disorder in which the blood does not clot. Hemophilia Awareness Month came at a time of both progress and remaining challenges.
1. Many more treatment products are being introduced, including some that last longer.
People with hemophilia lack or have defects in a “factor”—a blood protein that helps normal clots form. Of the approximately 20,000 people with hemophilia in the U.S., about 80 percent have hemophilia A, caused by an abnormally low level of factor VIII, and most of the rest have hemophilia B, caused by abnormally low levels of factor IX. Many patients with severe hemophilia give themselves prophylactic IV infusions of the missing factor to prevent bleeding (which otherwise can lead to crippling joint disease when blood seeps into the joint and enzymes released from blood cells erode the cartilage).
Hemophilia factors traditionally have such a short half-life that we tend to treat patients every other day with factor VIII and twice a week with factor IX. The first two longer-lasting products came onto the market within the past year, and more are on the way. So now, with factor IX, it is possible to get an infusion just once a week and not bleed. This is really changing how we think about the disease. So far, the longer-acting factor VIII products are not yet long-lasting enough to make as dramatic a difference in the frequency of infusions. And creating really long-acting factors remains a challenge.
2. Other new products are coming to market as factors go off patent.
The expiration of patents opens up a field that was limited to a few products as recently as 2014. Some companies are considering making bio-similars—generic-like products for complex protein molecules—for the more expensive factors.
Meanwhile, clinicians are trying to cut through the hype that often accompanies the introduction of new products to help patients understand what’s actually happening. I am about to lead an observational study for the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network that will follow patients as they switch to the newer products and evaluate how well the products perform in terms of safety and how well they prevent bleeds. We’re trying to take this kind of observational study out of the exclusive hands of drug companies, which conduct proprietary studies of their particular products, and instead collect data that cuts across brands.
3. Gene therapy is the next big thing.
Gene therapy is progressing much faster for factor IX than for factor VIII, because the factor VIII gene is so physically large that it doesn’t fit perfectly into the vector that delivers gene therapy. In the case of factor IX, however, the vector can be delivered through an IV infusion. It then travels directly to the liver, which is where the factor is produced. The therapy appears to be very safe, according to early results published in 2011 and updated in 2014. Although it doesn’t work for everybody, researchers are getting to the point where they believe they can reliably turn severe hemophilia into moderate or mild disease. If they can really turn severe hemophilia into mild hemophilia with one IV infusion, it would completely change the whole field of hemophilia, making factor prophylaxis a thing of the past. The gene therapy trials are starting with adults; therapy will be more difficult in children because the added gene would get diluted by the growing liver.
4. New regimens require less frequent prophylactic infusions, even with less long-lasting products.
Traditionally, U.S. clinicians had patients infuse themselves two or three times a week to boost the missing factor to one percent of their blood, under the theory that this was the threshold needed to prevent bleeds. Canadian researchers showed you can start treating only once a week, and a number of U.S. centers are now following this regimen. If it prevents bleeding, then the patient stays on a once-a-week regimen even if his factor level is below one percent. If it doesn’t prevent bleeding, then the frequency of infusion is increased. We now often use this regimen with our young children. If once a week works, a home care nurse can come in and give an IV instead of surgically inserting a port. It also helps us learn what the patient really needs.
5. The biggest challenge: reducing the risk of inhibitor antibodies that keep factors from working.
If a patient’s body treats the factor as a foreign protein and makes an antibody that keeps it from working, it’s as if he hadn’t even been given a dose. We can get rid of inhibitors in two thirds of patients who get them through Immune Tolerance Induction—by giving enough factor (daily, for months or even years) to confuse the immune system and make it forget it’s a foreign protein. About 10 percent of patients, however, are left with high-titer inhibitors that we can’t overcome, which is life-altering and can be terrible. There are hints from experiments in mice that some of the newer factors might lower the incidence of inhibitors in people with severe hemophilia. But mice aren’t people. If this does turn out to be true in humans, it would be a major breakthrough.
Assisting and Advocating for the Bleeding Disorders Community